Let a^ and b^ be two unit vectors such that (a^+b^)+2(a^×b^)=2. If θ∈(0,π) is the angle between a^ and b^, then among the statements :(S 1): 2a^×b^=a^−b^(S2) : The projection of a^ on (a^+b^) is 21 [24-Jun-2022-Shift-2]
📖 Explanation
Squaring the magnitude equation ∣a^+b^+2(a^×b^)∣=2 reveals the relationship between the vectors and the angle θ between them. Since (a^+b^) is orthogonal to (a^×b^), the squared magnitude distributes as:
∣a^+b^∣2+∣2(a^×b^)∣2=4
Expanding these terms yields ∣a^∣2+∣b^∣2+2a^⋅b^+4∣a^∣2∣b^∣2sin2θ=4. Substituting the unit vector magnitudes results in 2+2cosθ+4sin2θ=4. Replacing sin2θ with 1−cos2θ transforms this into the quadratic expression 2cos2θ−cosθ−1=0, which factors into (2cosθ+1)(cosθ−1)=0. Given the restriction θ∈(0,π), cosθ must equal −0.5, which corresponds to θ=2π/3.
Comparing 2∣a^×b^∣ to ∣a^−b^∣ confirms the validity of the first statement. With θ=2π/3, the magnitude of the cross product is sin(2π/3)=3/2, making 2∣a^×b^∣=3. Simultaneously, the magnitude of the difference vector is ∣a^∣2+∣b^∣2−2a^⋅b^=1+1−2(−0.5)=3. As both calculations yield the same result, the first assertion is true.
The projection of a^ onto (a^+b^) is defined by the ratio ∣a^+b^∣a^⋅(a^+b^). The dot product in the numerator simplifies to ∣a^∣2+a^⋅b^=1−0.5=0.5. The denominator magnitude is ∣a^∣2+∣b^∣2+2a^⋅b^=1+1−1=1. Consequently, the ratio is 0.5/1=0.5, indicating that the second statement is also accurate.