To determine the derivative of f(f(f(x)))+(f(x))2 at x=1, we apply the chain rule separately to each term. The derivative of the triple composition f(f(f(x))) is calculated as f′(f(f(x)))⋅f′(f(x))⋅f′(x), while the derivative of the power term (f(x))2 follows the power rule as 2f(x)⋅f′(x). Evaluating these expressions at x=1, where f(1)=1, simplifies the composite chain to f′(1)⋅f′(1)⋅f′(1) and the power term to 2f(1)⋅f′(1). Using the provided values f(1)=1 and f′(1)=3, the calculation becomes 3⋅3⋅3+2⋅1⋅3, which results in 27+6 for a final value of 33.
Q62JEE Main 2019MCQ
If 2y=(cot−1(cosx−3sinx3cosx+sinx))2,x∈(0,2π) then dxdy is equal to:
Dividing both the numerator and the denominator of the internal fraction by 2 reveals standard trigonometric ratios, where 23=sin(3π) and 21=cos(3π). Substituting these values transforms the expression into cos(3π)cosx−sin(3π)sinxsin(3π)cosx+cos(3π)sinx, which simplifies using angle sum formulas to cos(3π+x)sin(3π+x), or tan(3π+x). Given that cot−1(tanθ)=2π−θ, the original relationship becomes 2y=(2π−(3π+x))2, which reduces to 2y=(6π−x)2. Differentiating this expression with respect to x by applying the chain rule produces 2dxdy=2(6π−x)⋅(−1), which resolves to the final derivative of dxdy=x−6π.
Q63JEE Main 2019MCQ
The derivative of tan−1(sinx+cosxsinx−cosx) with respect to 2x, where (x∈(0,2π)) is
Simplifying the expression involves dividing the numerator and denominator by cosx to express the argument of the inverse tangent as tanx+1tanx−1, which is identical to tan(x−4π). Because the inverse tangent function cancels with the tangent function, the original expression reduces simply to x−4π, and its derivative with respect to x is 1. The requirement is to differentiate this with respect to 2x rather than x, which involves dividing the derivative of the original expression by the derivative of 2x. Since the derivative of 2x is 21, the final result is:
211=2
Q64JEE Main 2019MCQ
If ey+xy=e, the ordered pair (dxdy,dx2d2y) at x=0 is equal to:
Implicit differentiation is the standard method for determining derivatives of equations where variables remain intertwined rather than explicitly separated. Differentiating ey+xy=e with respect to x gives eydxdy+y+xdxdy=0, and setting x=0 leads to ey=e, or y=1, which simplifies the first derivative evaluation to edxdy+1=0, yielding dxdy=−e1. Differentiating the equation a second time requires applying the product rule to each term to obtain ey(dxdy)2+eydx2d2y+2dxdy+xdx2d2y=0. Substituting the values x=0,y=1, and dxdy=−e1 into this expression results in e1+edx2d2y−e2=0, establishing that edx2d2y=e1, or dx2d2y=e21.
Q65JEE Main 2018MCQ
If x=2cosec−1t and y=2sec−1t(∣t∣≥1) then dxdy is equal to:[Main 16 April 2018 S1]
Using the inverse trigonometric identity cosec−1t+sec−1t=2π for ∣t∣≥1, the product of the squared expressions x2=2cosec−1t and y2=2sec−1t simplifies to x2y2=2cosec−1t+sec−1t=22π. Since 22π is a constant, differentiating the implicit relation x2y2=22π with respect to x using the product rule gives 2xy2+x2(2ydxdy)=0. Solving for the derivative yields 2x2ydxdy=−2xy2, which simplifies to dxdy=−xy.
L'Hôpital's Rule states that if f(0)=0 and f′(0)=0, the limit limx→0xf′(x) is equal to f′′(0). The derivative of the determinant f(x) is the sum of determinants obtained by differentiating each row sequentially, and evaluating this at x=0 shows that f′(0)=0 because of row dependence and zero-value rows.
Evaluation of the second derivative f′′(0) utilizes the formula
f′′(0)=∑Ri′′RjRk+2∑Ri′Rj′Rk
. Using the values R1(0)=(1,0,1), R2(0)=(0,0,0), R3(0)=(0,0,1), R1′(0)=(0,1,0), R2′(0)=(2,0,2), R3′(0)=(1,1,0), R1′′(0)=(−1,0,0), R2′′(0)=(0,2,0), and R3′′(0)=(0,0,0), the expression simplifies to: f′′(0)=0+100020101+0+2020100021+0+2121001120
Simplification of the non-zero determinants yields 2+2(−2)+0, which equals −2.
Q67JEE Main 2018MCQ
If x2+y2+siny=4, then the value of dx2d2y at the point (−2,0) is:[Main 15 April 2018 S1]
Implicit differentiation of the equation x2+y2+siny=4 with respect to x yields 2x+2ydxdy+cosydxdy=0. Substituting the point (−2,0) into this expression results in 2(−2)+2(0)dxdy+cos(0)dxdy=0, which simplifies to −4+dxdy=0, identifying the first derivative value as dxdy=4. Differentiating the implicit expression 2x+2ydxdy+cosydxdy=0 again with respect to x produces 2+2(dxdy)2+2ydx2d2y−siny(dxdy)2+cosydx2d2y=0. Substituting x=−2, y=0, and dxdy=4 into this second-order equation gives 2+2(4)2+2(0)dx2d2y−sin(0)(4)2+cos(0)dx2d2y=0. This reduces to 2+32+dx2d2y=0, which results in dx2d2y=−34.
Q68JEE Main 2017MCQ
Let f be a polynomial function such that f(3x)=f′(x)⋅f′′(x), for all x∈R. Then :[Main 9 April 2017]
Assuming f(x)=axn to satisfy the polynomial degree requirement, the derivatives are f′(x)=naxn−1 and f′′(x)=n(n−1)axn−2. Substituting these into the expression f(3x)=f′(x)⋅f′′(x) gives a(3x)n=(naxn−1)(n(n−1)axn−2), which simplifies to a3nxn=n2(n−1)a2x2n−3. Equating the powers of x gives n=2n−3, or n=3, and equating coefficients yields 27a=32(3−1)a2, which simplifies to 27a=18a2, resulting in a=23.
With the function defined as f(x)=23x3, its derivatives are f′(x)=29x2 and f′′(x)=9x. Evaluating these at x=2 results in f(2)=23(8)=12, f′(2)=29(4)=18, and f′′(2)=9(2)=18. Substituting these values into the expression f′′(2)−f′(2) yields 18−18=0.
Q69JEE Main 2017MCQ
If y=[x+x2−1]15+[x−x2−1]15,then (x2−1)dxd2y+xdxdy is equal to:[Main 8 April 2017]
Defining u=x+x2−1 and v=x−x2−1 allows the expression y=u15+v15 to be differentiated with respect to x using the chain rule. Because u⋅v=1, we can express v as u−1, which simplifies y to u15+u−15. Calculating the first derivative yields dxdy=15(u14−u−14)dxdu, where dxdu=x2−1u. Substituting this derivative back into the expression simplifies the first derivative to dxdy=x2−115(u15−u−15).
Setting z=u15−u−15, the relationship becomes x2−1dxdy=15z. Differentiating both sides of this equation with respect to x gives x2−1xdxdy+x2−1dx2d2y=15dxdz. Since dxdz=15(u14+u−14)dxdu=x2−115(u15+u−15), which is simply x2−115y, the equation becomes x2−1xdxdy+x2−1dx2d2y=x2−1225y. Multiplying the entire equation by x2−1 confirms that (x2−1)dx2d2y+xdxdy=225y.
Q70JEE Main 2017MCQ
If for x∈(0,41), the derivative of tan−1(1−9x36xx) is x⋅g(x) equals :-[Main 2017]
The core concept here relies on recognizing that the argument inside the inverse tangent function follows the pattern of the double-angle identity for tangent, specifically tan−1(1−θ22θ)=2tan−1(θ). By setting θ=3x3/2, the original expression becomes tan−1(1−(3x3/2)22(3x3/2)), which simplifies directly to 2tan−1(3x3/2).
Differentiating this simplified form requires applying the chain rule, where the derivative of 2tan−1(3x3/2) is 2⋅1+(3x3/2)21 multiplied by the derivative of the inner term 3x3/2. Calculating the derivative of 3x3/2 yields 3⋅23⋅x1/2, or 29x. Combining these components results in 1+9x32⋅29x, which simplifies to 1+9x39x. Factoring out the x as required by the problem statement leaves g(x) equal to 1+9x39.
Q71JEE Main 2014MCQ
If g is the inverse of a function fand f′(x)=1+x51,then g′(x) is equal to[Main 2014]
The core principle linking a function f and its inverse g is the identity f(g(x))=x. Differentiating both sides of this equation with respect to x using the chain rule yields f′(g(x))⋅g′(x)=1, which implies that the derivative of the inverse is simply the reciprocal of the function's derivative evaluated at g(x). Substituting the given f′(x)=1+x51 into this relation gives f′(g(x))=1+(g(x))51. Dividing one by this expression results in g′(x)=1+(g(x))5.
Q72JEE Main 2013MCQ
If y=sec(tan−1x),then dxdy at x = 1 is equal to[Main 2013]
Differentiating the composite function y=sec(tan−1x) requires applying the chain rule, which involves taking the derivative of the outer secant function multiplied by the derivative of the inner inverse tangent function. Since the derivative of sec(u) is sec(u)tan(u) and the derivative of tan−1x is 1+x21, the complete derivative is expressed as dxdy=sec(tan−1x)tan(tan−1x)⋅1+x21.
Evaluating this expression at x=1 involves substituting the value directly, where the inverse tangent component tan−1(1) corresponds to the angle 4π. At this angle, the secant value sec(4π) is 2 and the tangent value tan(4π) is 1, while the rational component 1+x21 simplifies to 21. Combining these results gives 2×1×21, which simplifies to 21.
Understanding the second derivative of an inverse function relies on applying the chain rule to the relationship dydx=(dxdy)−1 while differentiating with respect to y. Because the variable of differentiation is y, we express the derivative operator dyd as the product dydxdxd, which allows us to differentiate the reciprocal expression with respect to x.
When performing this operation, the chain rule yields −(dxdy)−2dx2d2y by applying the power rule to the first derivative. Multiplying this result by the remaining factor of dydx, which is equivalent to (dxdy)−1, simplifies the entire expression to −(dx2d2y)(dxdy)−3.
Q74JEE Main 2010MCQ
Let f:(−1,1)→R be a differentiable function with f(0)=−1 and f′(0)=1. Let g(x)=[f(2f(x)+2)]2. Then g′(0)=
The chain rule is the essential tool for differentiating a composite function, requiring us to peel back each layer starting from the outermost component. For the expression g(x)=[f(2f(x)+2)]2, the derivative g′(x) begins by applying the power rule to the outer square, resulting in 2f(2f(x)+2) multiplied by the derivative of the inner function. This inner derivative is found by applying the chain rule again, which produces f′(2f(x)+2) multiplied by the derivative of the nested term 2f(x)+2, specifically 2f′(x). Combining these components yields the full derivative:
g′(x)=4f(2f(x)+2)⋅f′(2f(x)+2)⋅f′(x)
Evaluating this at x=0 requires substituting the known values f(0)=−1 and f′(0)=1. The argument within the function simplifies to 2f(0)+2=2(−1)+2=0, allowing for a direct numerical evaluation. Substituting these values into the derivative formula provides the final result:
g′(0)=4f(0)⋅f′(0)⋅f′(0)=4(−1)(1)2=−4
Q75JEE Main 2009MCQ
Let y be an implicit function of x defined by x2x−2xxcoty−1=0. Then y′(1) equals
Implicit differentiation becomes significantly more manageable if we first isolate the trigonometric term, rewriting the equation x2x−2xxcoty−1=0 as 2coty=xx−x−x. Differentiating both sides with respect to x requires the chain rule on the left side and the derivative of powers of x on the right, producing the following relationship:
−2csc2y⋅y′=(xx+x−x)(1+logx)
Substituting x=1 into the original rearranged equation gives 2coty=11−1−1=0, which establishes that coty=0. Because csc2y=1+cot2y, we find that csc2y=1+02=1 at this point. Substituting these values into the derivative expression yields −2(1)⋅y′=(1+1)(1+log1), which simplifies to −2y′=2. Consequently, y′(1)=−1.
Applying natural logarithms to both sides of the equation simplifies the exponentiation and product, transforming the expression into mlnx+nlny=(m+n)ln(x+y). This strategy makes differentiation significantly more manageable by converting the implicit relationship into a linear form where the power rule is no longer required for the outer functions.
Differentiating both sides with respect to x provides the equation xm+yndxdy=x+ym+n(1+dxdy). Expanding the right side and grouping the terms involving dxdy to one side allows for simple rearrangement into dxdy(yn−x+ym+n)=x+ym+n−xm. After finding a common denominator for both sides and simplifying the algebraic expressions, the common factors \in the numerators reduce, eventually yielding the result dxdy=xy.
Q77JEE Main 2003MCQ
Let f(x) be a polynomial function of second degree. If f(1)=f(−1) and a,b,c are in A. P, then f′(a),f′(b),f′(c) are in
For any second-degree polynomial defined as f(x)=Ax2+Bx+C, the condition f(1)=f(−1) implies A(1)2+B(1)+C=A(−1)2+B(−1)+C. Simplifying this equation gives A+B+C=A−B+C, which confirms that the linear coefficient B must be zero, reducing the function to f(x)=Ax2+C and its derivative to f′(x)=2Ax. Evaluating this derivative at three terms a, b, and c that form an Arithmetic Progression results in the values 2Aa, 2Ab, and 2Ac. Because a, b, and c share a common difference, their scalar multiples by 2A necessarily preserve that same proportional relationship, confirming that the resulting derivative values form an Arithmetic Progression.
Q78JEE Main 2003MCQ
If f(x)=xn, then the value off(1)−1!f′(1)+2!f′′(1)−3!f′′′(1)+⋯+n!(−1)nfn(1) is
The pattern in this series corresponds directly to the expansion of a binomial power. Computing the k-th derivative of f(x)=xn at x=1 yields f(k)(1)=(n−k)!n!, and dividing this value by k! isolates the binomial coefficient, (kn)=k!(n−k)!n!.
Replacing every term in the given series with its equivalent binomial coefficient creates the alternating sum (0n)−(1n)+(2n)−⋯+(−1)n(nn). By the binomial theorem, this alternating series represents the expansion of (1−1)n. Since (1−1)n=0n, the value of the entire expression is zero.
Finding the value of (1+x2)dx2d2y+xdxdy involves establishing a differential relationship by differentiating the function and eliminating the square root. Start by calculating the first derivative of y=(x+1+x2)n using the chain rule, which results in dxdy=n(x+1+x2)n−1⋅(1+1+x2x). Upon simplification, this becomes dxdy=1+x2ny, or alternatively 1+x2dxdy=ny. Squaring both sides yields (1+x2)(dxdy)2=n2y2. Differentiating this result with respect to x leads to (1+x2)⋅2dxdydx2d2y+(dxdy)2⋅2x=n2⋅2ydxdy. Dividing the entire equation by 2dxdy reduces the expression to (1+x2)dx2d2y+xdxdy=n2y.