The fishermen, _______ the flood victims owed their lives, were rewarded by the government.
📖 Explanation
This question tests our understanding of relative pronouns, especially how they work with prepositions. Relative pronouns connect a dependent clause (which gives more info) to an independent clause. For people, we use 'who' (subject) or 'whom' (object). For things or animals, we use 'which' or 'that'. Here, the relative pronoun refers to "fishermen," who are people. The phrase "owed their lives" needs the preposition "to" (they owed their lives to someone).
Let's break it down:
The main clause is "The fishermen were rewarded by the government."
The dependent clause is "_______ the flood victims owed their lives."
We need a relative pronoun that fits "fishermen" and works with "to."
- A. whom: 'Whom' is an object pronoun for people. However, the preposition 'to' is missing from the beginning of the clause. You can't just say "whom the flood victims owed their lives" because it should be "owed their lives to whom."
- B. to which: 'Which' is for things/animals, not people. Since "fishermen" are people, this is incorrect.
- C. to whom: 'Whom' is the correct object pronoun for people, and placing 'to' before it, as in "to whom the flood victims owed their lives," correctly incorporates the necessary preposition for the phrase "owed their lives to." This makes the clause grammatically sound and links it to "fishermen."
- D. that: 'That' can refer to people but doesn't usually take a preceding preposition in this formal context. "That the flood victims owed their lives" doesn't correctly include the required "to."
Therefore, the correct choice is "to whom" because it refers to people ("fishermen") and correctly uses the preposition "to" from "owed their lives to."


















