📖 Explanation
Let's break down each statement to see if it can be concluded from the passage.
Statement (i): Nowadays, computers are present in almost all places.
The passage clearly states, "Computers are ubiquitous," and "They are used to improve efficiency in almost all fields from agriculture to space exploration." "Ubiquitous" means present everywhere, and "almost all fields" supports this widespread presence. So, statement (i) is a valid deduction.
Statement (ii): Computers cannot be used for solving problems in engineering.
The passage mentions computers are used in "almost all fields from agriculture to space exploration." Space exploration heavily involves complex engineering. Therefore, computers can be used in engineering, which contradicts statement (ii). So, statement (ii) is not a valid deduction.
Statement (iii): For humans, there are both positive and negative effects of using computers.
The passage states, "For humans, sitting in front of a computer for long hours can lead to health issues," which is a negative effect. The passage also mentions computers "improve efficiency in almost all fields," implying positive outcomes from their use. Thus, both positive and negative effects are implied. So, statement (iii) is a valid deduction.
Statement (iv): Artificial intelligence can be done without data.
The passage defines AI: "AI enables computers to learn, given enough training data." The phrase "given enough training data" explicitly indicates that data is a requirement for AI to learn. This directly refutes statement (iv). So, statement (iv) is not a valid deduction.
Based on this analysis, only statements (i) and (iii) can be deduced from the passage.